Ketamine Clinical Trials
Comparison of different forms of sedation during endoscopie of the bile ducts
To see complete record on www.trialregister.nl, please visit this link
Organisation Name: Department of Anesthesiology and , Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre,
Overal Status: Stopped, trial finished
Start Date: 2015-12-01
Lead Sponsor: Department of Anesthesiology and , Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre,
Brief Summary: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a complex, often painful gastrointestinal procedure. Since any movement of the patient could considerably affect success of the ERCP, procedures are usually performed under deep sedation. ERCP is often combined with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in order to obtain images and information about the digestive tract and the surrounding tissue and organs. Over the last decade the combination of propofol and an opioid has become the standard sedative regime during ERCP in many countries, despite known side effects, such as hypotension and respiratory depression, leading eventually to severe hypoxemia. Opioids, especially when used in combination with sedative-hypnotics, can not only aggravate clinically significant respiratory depression but also increase the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Esketamine, the s-enantiomer of ketamine - is not only a well-known sedative, but also has strong analgesic properties. Furthermore, its sympathomimetic qualities can counteract the hemodynamic depression of propofol, reducing the risk of cardiovascular or respiratory depression during sedation. Esketamine could thus be a safer additive to propofol than opioids to achieve an adequate level of sedation and analgesia with less negative cardiopulmonary side effects due to reduction of the required dosage of propofol and omission of opioids.
The aim of this study is to demonstrate that procedural sedation with propofol and esketamine is more effective and will result in less cardiopulmonary depression than sedation with propofol and the opioid alfentanil. Less side effects should also lead to higher safety profiles of this sedation regime. The primary objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of propofol/esketamine compared to propofol/alfentanil sedation, both administered by anaesthetic nurses trained in procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA). Considering effectiveness there are four aspects to determine the effectiveness of the propofol/esketamine regime. First, will the synergistic combination of propofol and esketamine result in a dosage reduction of propofol? Secondly, are the levels of sedation and analgesia (without opioids) sufficient to perform the procedure? Thirdly, are patients more satisfied by the combination propofol/esketamine concerning side effects? Fourth, is recovery time shorter? Secondary objectives concern patient safety. Safety is thereby a synonym for a reduction in pulmonary and cardiovascular incidents and complications (hypotension, respiratory depression, hypoxemia) that could be attributed to the respective sedation regime.
Patients will be randomized to an esketamine and propofol regime (interventional arm) or to an alfentanil/propofol regime (control arm) and studied during the endoscopic procedure.
Main study parameters are the total dosage of propofol, recovery time, and satisfaction with the procedure of patients and endoscopists
Secondary study parameters concerning the safety aspect, are recording of oxygen saturation (SpO2) measured by pulse oximetry, respiratory rate (RR), exhaled CO2 (capnography), heart rate (HR), arrhythmias (ECG) and non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP). These vital parameters will indicate pulmonary and cardiovascular incidents, experienced by the patient during sedation.
Total execution time in seconds: 0.14332485198975